S henever I thought that in this world should not exist the dilemma of doing good or bad ... and I do not mean good and evil, it is an inherent existence in my opinion, is more rightly be ... I mean good and bad as a full verb activity. The good news will undoubtedly be charged with a touch of egotism, bad for his party will set out our alter ego ... but who has told us the good and bad and beyond ... for whom? The good and bad is always charged and found mixed feelings of evil and goodness, the bipolarity of these actions are little equidistant to understand and implement them even more politically impossible ...
However, if instead thinking about the good and bad, we take as a starting point "the best" starting point is reduced even more, resulting in fact trigger a less ambivalent. That is, do the best for me, for you, for them or for anyone but the best ...
When we do our best, we speak of an end to a destination, an outcome ... so also speaks of freedom because freedom is the basic fact of human primary ... the grazed by which to make decisions, choices, because of their ambivalence, doubts ... the absence of freedom is over the question, reason and truth dry dictated but not infinite. Freedom is not
a fact of politics, the Justice or the media is a fact that involves the society in which we live, where you exercise at every moment a decision, so, I rise today not only in favor of an opinion leader as Carmen Aristegui, I rise in favor of an act, a verb, a decision ... because freedom is the action most of the human being, which is expressed, it is revealed, we agree ... The media have several comments tried to support, victimize or destroy the journalist, forgotten, it is not only of an opinion leader, but the representative human being ... who but a woman who is heard every morning for an audience of thousands of listeners, who but she, and not just about women as a journalist, but women as leaders, such as voice, as a source, such as contact ... who but to ask what it might be a question singularly out of context in private life, but not in public life ... to understand the limits of the private and the public is difficult, as difficult as understanding the good and bad ... unfortunately or fortunately we live in a world in which public and private are almost imperceptible in their substantial difference ... because the public is very public and private sectors is simply unique.
So I think this act should be reflective in politics and the means and realize that the fact is not only the dismissal of a charismatic leader of opinion, but the true fact is the agony of liberty in our land and our means ... because if you can not censor a leader to say or question ... we can expect us mere mortals that we do by raising his voice and to be present ... we can expect? Thus it is not simply defend a voice but thousands of voices behind that woman there ...
Freedom is freedom, and is not always moral ... however if it is plural. Pao
valdivieso
However, if instead thinking about the good and bad, we take as a starting point "the best" starting point is reduced even more, resulting in fact trigger a less ambivalent. That is, do the best for me, for you, for them or for anyone but the best ...
When we do our best, we speak of an end to a destination, an outcome ... so also speaks of freedom because freedom is the basic fact of human primary ... the grazed by which to make decisions, choices, because of their ambivalence, doubts ... the absence of freedom is over the question, reason and truth dry dictated but not infinite. Freedom is not
a fact of politics, the Justice or the media is a fact that involves the society in which we live, where you exercise at every moment a decision, so, I rise today not only in favor of an opinion leader as Carmen Aristegui, I rise in favor of an act, a verb, a decision ... because freedom is the action most of the human being, which is expressed, it is revealed, we agree ... The media have several comments tried to support, victimize or destroy the journalist, forgotten, it is not only of an opinion leader, but the representative human being ... who but a woman who is heard every morning for an audience of thousands of listeners, who but she, and not just about women as a journalist, but women as leaders, such as voice, as a source, such as contact ... who but to ask what it might be a question singularly out of context in private life, but not in public life ... to understand the limits of the private and the public is difficult, as difficult as understanding the good and bad ... unfortunately or fortunately we live in a world in which public and private are almost imperceptible in their substantial difference ... because the public is very public and private sectors is simply unique.
So I think this act should be reflective in politics and the means and realize that the fact is not only the dismissal of a charismatic leader of opinion, but the true fact is the agony of liberty in our land and our means ... because if you can not censor a leader to say or question ... we can expect us mere mortals that we do by raising his voice and to be present ... we can expect? Thus it is not simply defend a voice but thousands of voices behind that woman there ...
Freedom is freedom, and is not always moral ... however if it is plural. Pao
valdivieso
Only the best online. Culture, newspaper, reviews and more ... only the best 
0 comments:
Post a Comment